← Back

How do you determine the root cause of a denial instead of simply correcting and resubmitting the claim?

Login to save this question

Short Answer

To determine the root cause of a denial, I would review the payer denial reason, claim history, patient eligibility, authorization, coding, provider details, and prior submissions to identify what actually caused the payment failure. The goal is to correct the underlying issue, not just resubmit the same claim and risk another denial.

Detailed Answer

Finding the root cause of a denial means looking beyond the denial code and determining why the issue occurred in the first place.

The process should start with the payer’s denial information, including the ERA or EOB, claim adjustment reason codes, remark codes, payer messages, and any available claim status details. These provide the initial direction, but they should not always be treated as the complete explanation.

Next, review the entire claim and account history.

This may include:

  • Patient eligibility on the date of service
  • Primary and secondary insurance order
  • Prior authorization or referral requirements
  • Provider enrollment or network status
  • CPT, HCPCS, ICD-10-CM, and modifier usage
  • Place of service
  • Units billed
  • Dates of service
  • Claim frequency or corrected-claim indicators
  • Timely filing history
  • Previous submissions and payer responses
  • Documentation available in the medical record

The objective is to identify the source of the error.

For example, if a claim is denied for missing authorization, the immediate issue may appear to be authorization. But further review may show that authorization was actually obtained and the denial occurred because the wrong authorization number was submitted.

In another case, multiple claims may be denied for eligibility. The true root cause may be that the registration team is using outdated insurance information rather than an isolated claim error.

Root-cause analysis is especially important when the same denial appears repeatedly. If several claims from the same provider, payer, procedure, or location are affected, this may indicate a broader workflow problem.

Once the cause is confirmed, the appropriate resolution should be selected. That may include:

  • Corrected claim submission
  • Reconsideration
  • Formal appeal
  • Additional documentation
  • Eligibility correction
  • Authorization correction
  • Coding review
  • Provider enrollment correction
  • Internal workflow improvement

A strong denial-management process also documents the root cause and communicates recurring issues to the responsible team so future denials can be prevented.

The goal is not only to recover one payment, but to reduce the chance that the same issue affects future claims.

Key Points to Mention

  • Start with the payer’s denial reason, but investigate beyond the denial code.
  • Review the full claim and account history.
  • Check eligibility, authorization, coding, provider data, and filing history.
  • Compare the denial with the original claim information.
  • Look for patterns across similar claims.
  • Distinguish the symptom from the actual cause.
  • Choose the resolution based on the confirmed root cause.
  • Document recurring denial causes.
  • Share systemic issues with the appropriate team.
  • Root-cause analysis supports both recovery and denial prevention.
  • Example Scenario

    Several claims for the same provider are denied as provider not eligible to perform the service.

    Instead of correcting and resubmitting each claim individually, the AR team investigates the provider’s payer enrollment.

    The review shows that the provider’s enrollment effective date was entered incorrectly in the billing system, causing claims before the correct effective date to be submitted under the wrong status.

    The team corrects the underlying enrollment data, determines the appropriate action for the affected claims, and prevents new claims from being submitted with the same issue.

    Common Mistakes

  • Resubmitting the claim without reviewing the denial reason.
  • Assuming the denial code always identifies the full root cause.
  • Correcting only the individual claim instead of the source data.
  • Ignoring patterns across multiple claims.
  • Failing to review prior submissions and follow-up notes.
  • Treating payer processing errors as internal billing errors without verification.
  • Filing appeals before confirming whether a corrected claim would be more appropriate.
  • Resolving denials without documenting the cause.
  • Failing to communicate recurring issues to other RCM teams.
  • Interview Tip

    Show the interviewer that you think beyond individual claims. Explain that you first identify what happened, why it happened, where in the workflow it originated, and how to prevent it from happening again.

    Related Interview Questions